What happens now
The answer exists, somewhere
A junior spends half a day reading a bundle to find the one clause that decides the question. The partner who drafted it three years ago could have named it in ten seconds, and is in court.
Legal AI · built for privilege
Every answer
carries a
pin cite.
Jurisyn is a private legal AI agent that works inside your firm’s team channels. Ask it a question about a matter and it answers from your own documents — with the document and page it came from attached to every line.
Works with iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint and Google Drive.
Your documents never leave your systems.
Riya Kamath 10:42
@jurisyn what notice period does the supply agreement need before we can terminate for repeated late delivery?
Jurisyn 10:42
Thirty days’ written notice, and the breach has to stay unremedied through that period.
Late delivery is only a terminable breach after three failures in any rolling six months. Two of the four delays on file fall outside that window.
Supply Agreement (executed 04.03.2024) · clause 14.2 · page 11
Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days’ written notice where the other party has committed a material breach which remains unremedied at the expiry of such notice.
Delivery performance log · page 7 · rows 12–19
Consignments 118, 124, 131 and 147 recorded as received after the contractual delivery date.
Answered from 3 documents in this matter · Riya has access to all 3
- In one sentence
- Jurisyn is a private legal AI agent for law firms that answers questions using only the matter documents a user is authorised to open, and cites the source document and page for every statement it makes.
The problem
Firms are not slow because lawyers are slow. They are slow because the answer is in a file nobody can find.
What happens next
Someone pastes it into a chatbot
It gives a confident, fluent answer with a case citation that does not exist. Worse, privileged client material has just been posted to a consumer service under someone’s personal login.
What Jurisyn changes
Ask in the channel, get the cite
The question goes to the matter channel the team already uses. The answer comes back grounded in the firm’s own files, with the page number, ready to be checked in one tap.
How it works
Four steps, then it is part of the day
Connect the document system
Jurisyn reads from iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, Google Drive or a file share. It connects with an account you control and can revoke. Nothing is copied out of the system of record.
Index by matter, with permissions attached
Documents are indexed matter by matter, and every passage carries the access rules of the file it came from. Ethical walls are part of the index, not a filter applied afterwards.
Ask in the matter channel
Mention Jurisyn in Slack or Microsoft Teams the way you would ask a colleague. It checks what the person asking is allowed to see before it retrieves anything.
Check the cite, then use it
Each statement links to the passage it came from. Open it, confirm it, move on. Every question and every document touched is written to an audit log the firm can export.
Compared
Fluent is not the same as reliable
| Jurisyn | General AI chatbot | Searching by hand | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where answers come from | Only your matter documents | Public training data, plus whatever gets pasted in | Your matter documents |
| Citation on every statement | Yes — document and page | No — often invented | Yes, if you note it down |
| Respects matter-level access | Yes, checked per query | No | Yes |
| Client confidentiality | Documents stay in your systems | Uploaded to a third party by the user | Intact |
| Audit trail | Every question, answer and file logged | None the firm can see | None |
| Time to a sourced answer | Seconds | Seconds, then hours verifying | Thirty minutes to half a day |
Built for the way firms are regulated
Confidentiality is the product, not a settings page
Access
Inherited, per query
If you cannot open the file, Jurisyn will not quote it or admit it exists.
Retention
No training on your data
Your documents are never used to train a model, ours or anyone else’s.
Residency
You choose the region
India, EU, UK or your own cloud tenancy, fixed at deployment.
Record
Exportable audit log
Who asked what, which files were read, and what came back.
Questions firms ask first
Straight answers
No. Documents stay inside your Jurisyn instance. Jurisyn retrieves the passages relevant to a question and sends only those passages to the reasoning model, under a zero-retention agreement, and the model provider does not keep them or train on them. You can also run Jurisyn against a model hosted in your own cloud tenancy, in which case nothing leaves your infrastructure at all.
Jurisyn only answers from passages it has actually retrieved from your files. Every sentence in an answer carries a citation to the document and page it came from, and you can open that passage in one tap to check it. When the retrieved documents do not support an answer, Jurisyn says so and shows you what it did find, rather than filling the gap.
The citation is not a footnote. It is the point. An answer you cannot check is an answer you cannot use.
No. Jurisyn inherits permissions from your document management system on every single query. If a person cannot open a file in iManage, NetDocuments or SharePoint, Jurisyn will not retrieve it, quote it, or acknowledge that it exists. Information barriers and ethical walls carry across unchanged.
SharePoint and OneDrive, iManage, NetDocuments, Google Drive, and plain network file shares. If your files sit somewhere else, tell us during the pilot conversation and we will confirm whether a connector is feasible before you commit to anything.
See it answer a question from your own files
A demo runs on a folder of your documents, not ours. Thirty minutes, no slides, and you keep the index or we delete it — your call.